another client code question

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Wed Feb 14 19:19:17 GMT 2007

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:30:20AM -0800, Herb Lewis wrote:
> struct cli_state declares an element "int timeout;"
> but this value is used as a parameter to client_receive_smb
> and other functions which declare it as unsigned int timeout.
> Should we change the cli_state structure to have it
> as unsigned int timeout?

Even more correct would be a 'struct timeval', but that
might be a bit excessive :-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the samba-technical mailing list