svn commit: samba r21111 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source:
modules param smbd
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Thu Feb 1 17:49:42 GMT 2007
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:23:27AM -0800, James Peach wrote:
> I would have thought that both inotify and FAM should be modules?
I thought about that, but decided against it. We want to
have inotify as a default if it is available, FAM only as a
fallback for platforms which do not have inotify. So by
default it would have to be a static module, I don't want
smbd to fail if it is not correctly installed.
We can move inotify to modules/ if someone comes up with an
alternative implementation of a different mechanism on, say,
FreeBSD that provides an equally accepted interface. Should
be easily possible. And if you feel like it, just do it :-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070201/cd89c839/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical