u32 use in tdb

[Jelmer Vernooij]

Hi,

TDB defines a new type "u32" that appears to have the same meaning as
uint32_t. Since the latter is already provided by libreplace (which is
used by TDB), is there a reason for not switching to uint32_t
everywhere?

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20070807/2e209ecc/attachment.bin