svn commit: samba r18187 - in
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Sep 7 00:12:09 GMT 2006
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 01:49 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:28 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 01:24 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 09:21:08AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 18:13 +0000, jerry at samba.org wrote:
> > > > > Author: jerry
> > > > > Date: 2006-09-06 18:13:16 +0000 (Wed, 06 Sep 2006)
> > > > > New Revision: 18187
> > >
> > > > > WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=18187
> > >
> > > > > Log:
> > > > > Replace copy of idl files with a svn:externals link.
> > > > > Will fix the build_idl.sh script to only process the files
> > > > > we are concerned with in this branch.
> > > > Does this mean that we can no longer check out SAMBA_3_0 over just SSH?
> > > Yes, you will also need to be able to open a connection to the SVN
> > > port.
> > >
> > > > I was wondering if we could have the main SVN database have the SSH URL,
> > > > but change it to SVN anon when we create the anon export?
> > > That'll be tricky to do. Is there a specific reason you are trying to
> > > do SSH connections only?
> > One is that it gives me a nice, warm fuzzy feeling that the code is
> > being checked out over a trusted channel (important when then cutting a
> > release and signing it).
> That's a very rare case. You can still check out those directories over
> SSH if you really need to.
> > Also the need to allow a different port out of firewalls etc.
> We (the committers) are the only people for which the situation changes.
I presume we also can't commit to that part of the tree any more?
> I agree that it's not perfect, but it does make managing these two
> directories a lot easier.
It would be good if SVN externals took a relative URL.
> Another option would be to switch to using Apache2 + mod_svn in which
> case anonymous and authenticated users can use the same server, though I
> remember there were some security concerns with that.
I really don't want us to do that.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060907/cfe68341/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical