svn commit: samba r18030 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/tdb/common: .

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> 
>>> So that means most of the nested structures we use 
>>> can just stay, and we would only need move the definitions
>>> of named structs out of the nesting. And I think that
>>> would be ok.
> 
> Thanks metze.  (volker just explained the same thing
> to me to in another mail).
> 
> Named structures really should be nested anyways IMO.

I hope from the context everyone realizes I mean
"should not be nested"





jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE/XGfIR7qMdg1EfYRAhEJAJ4/RsIZK7aeDj2uuLXajeI3lHcArgCghOuR
1p3uFNNN7nmJ4WyLDcATyeE=
=zB0E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----