svn commit: samba r18030
- in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/tdb/common: .
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Tue Sep 5 12:46:23 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>>> So that means most of the nested structures we use
>>> can just stay, and we would only need move the definitions
>>> of named structs out of the nesting. And I think that
>>> would be ok.
> Thanks metze. (volker just explained the same thing
> to me to in another mail).
> Named structures really should be nested anyways IMO.
I hope from the context everyone realizes I mean
"should not be nested"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical