svn commit: samba r18030 - in
jra at samba.org
Mon Sep 4 17:47:13 GMT 2006
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:07:01PM +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> this may be a step too far. C and C++ are different languages, and
> while it is useful to be able to get warnings from g++ is nice, I
> don't think it should lead us to worse coding practices. Nesting
> structure definitions keeps structure definitions cleaner, and keeps
> related structures closer together.
> Do you actually have plans to use real C++ somewhere with the Samba
> code, or is this purely for the warnings?
As you know, it has always been my dream eventually to have Samba
in C++ :-). So moving closer to it is a good thing IMHO.
More information about the samba-technical