svn commit: samba r18030 -
in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/tdb/common: .
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Mon Sep 4 14:24:14 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
tridge at samba.org schrieb:
> > in the header files would be all we need.
> > That's what I see in a lot of files under /usr/include/
> > e.g. all apr*.h files
> I know a lot of libs do that, but I was under the (possibly
> misguided!) impression that a naive port to C++ like that leads to a
> very poor library for C++ use.
> I know its OK for libraries with really simple interfaces (like most
> of libc), but is it really useful for libraries with much more complex
> semantics like tdb, talloc, ldb, libndr, pidl etc ?
> What sort of applications do you think will use this? If there really
> is a big need for it then great, I just don't want us to add such an
> ugly coding convention unless there is some real gain.
I don't want add ugly coding conventions:-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical