svn commit: samba r18030 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/tdb/common: .

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher metze at samba.org
Mon Sep 4 12:38:10 GMT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

tridge at samba.org schrieb:
> Metze,
> 
>  > ok, I'll do some experiments, when I start merging...
>  > And I think we should make samba4 also able to compile with c++.
> 
> Only if we don't have to make compromises in code readability.

yes, the goal should be to let c++ applications make use of our libraries.

> Is there some advantage to this beyond the nice warnings that I
> haven't spotted?
> 
> Getting rid of 'new' and 'private' is harmless. Losing a very natural
> way to declare structures isn't :-)

yes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE/B4wm70gjA5TCD8RAoWJAJ9chMvFP5Zsk+2rYrC70DfHSWsRsACgqLXn
557nToGlCxtxuF8altJM9BM=
=/pdz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the samba-technical mailing list