svn commit: samba r18030 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/tdb/common: .

tridge at tridge at
Mon Sep 4 12:11:11 GMT 2006


 > ok, I'll do some experiments, when I start merging...
 > And I think we should make samba4 also able to compile with c++.

Only if we don't have to make compromises in code readability.

Is there some advantage to this beyond the nice warnings that I
haven't spotted?

Getting rid of 'new' and 'private' is harmless. Losing a very natural
way to declare structures isn't :-)

Cheers, Tridge

More information about the samba-technical mailing list