svn commit: samba r18030 -
in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/tdb/common: .
tridge at samba.org
tridge at samba.org
Mon Sep 4 12:11:11 GMT 2006
Metze,
> ok, I'll do some experiments, when I start merging...
> And I think we should make samba4 also able to compile with c++.
Only if we don't have to make compromises in code readability.
Is there some advantage to this beyond the nice warnings that I
haven't spotted?
Getting rid of 'new' and 'private' is harmless. Losing a very natural
way to declare structures isn't :-)
Cheers, Tridge
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list