3_0 vs 3_0_23?

Gerald (Jerry) Carter jerry at samba.org
Fri Sep 1 18:12:27 GMT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:53:50PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>> My policy is that SAMBA_3_0_23 is for bug fixes only.
>> If you want something in the next 3.0.23 patch release,
>> it should go in.  At this point, I would say we should
>> limit fixes to reported issues or things that are
>> obviously wrong.
> 
> Well this is a bug reported against an unpatched W2K,
> so something's obviously wrong. We have to fix it,
> whether by Volker's patch or another.

I agree.  I wasn't saying anything against that change.
Rather just stating what my policy was.




jerry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE+HgKIR7qMdg1EfYRAoR4AJ4sFJ4mt40YLvbtf2n9GEP8P7VlFwCgxR09
U9DwaFcmNKArysSLnk/jC6M=
=0EuS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the samba-technical mailing list