3_0 vs 3_0_23?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Volker,
> 
> Just a quick question: What's the policy right 
> now with SAMBA_3_0 versus SAMBA_3_0_23? Has 3_0
> become the new trunk? I'm asking because I don't
> really know what I should have done with
> the NTLMSSP fix which I'm not 100% sure about yet
> if it fixes the issue.

My policy is that SAMBA_3_0_23 is for bug fixes only.
If you want something in the next 3.0.23 patch release,
it should go in.  At this point, I would say we should
limit fixes to reported issues or things that are
obviously wrong.



cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE+HOuIR7qMdg1EfYRAnifAJ9uo6oXRoHg2/csw6P+mFBxWEjWhwCg49ob
AyIp2S8Uo/kignx6K9Rbh3Q=
=OcVa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----