3_0 vs 3_0_23?
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Fri Sep 1 17:53:50 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Just a quick question: What's the policy right
> now with SAMBA_3_0 versus SAMBA_3_0_23? Has 3_0
> become the new trunk? I'm asking because I don't
> really know what I should have done with
> the NTLMSSP fix which I'm not 100% sure about yet
> if it fixes the issue.
My policy is that SAMBA_3_0_23 is for bug fixes only.
If you want something in the next 3.0.23 patch release,
it should go in. At this point, I would say we should
limit fixes to reported issues or things that are
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical