abartlet at samba.org
Fri Sep 1 07:50:45 GMT 2006
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 23:23 -0700, Murali Bashyam wrote:
> You are right, this is happening, i missed the implicit TCP connection
> teardown under the talloc_free.
> Is there any reason why we are not doing an explicit raw tree disconnect as
> part of the ntvfs disconnect? Is there any reason it may not work correctly?
> I guess that was the question on my mind.
Mostly, it is to avoid having resources hanging around after they are no
longer wanted: That is, we might be doing a shutdown because the client
has disconnected, so why spend resources to send the network packets,
when the server will handle it for you on TCP shutdown?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060901/7a42ef53/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical