abartlet at samba.org
Thu Oct 19 06:51:29 GMT 2006
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 08:51 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:59:29PM +1000, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> > I certainly like the abstractions you are putting in place for our
> > test suites, but I don't like the separate binaries plan. It smells
> > rather too much like libtool for my taste!
> If I was asked I'd agree with tridge here. Separate binaries
> are a real pain, I'm much rather willing to re-link on every
That's my gut feeling too.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20061019/10892290/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical