using virtual synchrony for CTDB
idra at samba.org
Fri Oct 6 20:26:31 GMT 2006
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 13:15 -0700, Tracy Camp wrote:
> CTDB appears to want a semantic where every node is free to asynchronously
> issue and handle messages without regard to other nodes issueing or
> handling messages. The whole point of the DMASTER, LMASTER concepts
> appears to avoid needing to broadcast state to every cluster member.
Yes this is exactly what CTDB is meant to. We don't need cluster-wide
coherency at all, and we don't want the overhead it implies.
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: idra at samba.org
More information about the samba-technical