svn commit: samba r19053 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet:
mimir at samba.org
Tue Oct 3 19:59:01 GMT 2006
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:01:19AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 22:18 +0000, mimir at samba.org wrote:
> > Author: mimir
> > Date: 2006-10-02 22:18:36 +0000 (Mon, 02 Oct 2006)
> > New Revision: 19053
> > WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=19053
> > Log:
> > match the flag values with the actual equivalents in samr.idl
> Why are we not using the SAMR bitmask directly?
Because I'd prefer to separate them from libnet. I'd like libnet
user to be able use it and touch no samr, lsa, and other samba
specifics. I hope it makes sense.
Samba Team member http://www.samba.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20061003/7015cdda/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical