svn commit: samba r19053 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet: .

[Rafal Szczesniak]

On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:01:19AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 22:18 +0000, mimir at samba.org wrote:
> > Author: mimir
> > Date: 2006-10-02 22:18:36 +0000 (Mon, 02 Oct 2006)
> > New Revision: 19053
> > 
> > WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=19053
> > 
> > Log:
> > match the flag values with the actual equivalents in samr.idl
> 
> Why are we not using the SAMR bitmask directly?

Because I'd prefer to separate them from libnet. I'd like libnet
user to be able use it and touch no samr, lsa, and other samba
specifics. I hope it makes sense.



cheers,
-- 
Rafal Szczesniak
Samba Team member  http://www.samba.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20061003/7015cdda/attachment.bin