svn commit: samba r19053 - in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/libnet: .

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Mon Oct 2 23:01:19 GMT 2006


On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 22:18 +0000, mimir at samba.org wrote:
> Author: mimir
> Date: 2006-10-02 22:18:36 +0000 (Mon, 02 Oct 2006)
> New Revision: 19053
> 
> WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=19053
> 
> Log:
> match the flag values with the actual equivalents in samr.idl

Why are we not using the SAMR bitmask directly?

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20061003/260ddf2c/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list