ldb for 3.0.24?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

simo wrote:

> Actually there is no difference in the upgrade path 
> from 3.0.23d to 3.0.24, the changes were internal to ldb, and
> target at getting more speed out of it (and they have not
> yet been ported back to samba3 anyway).   Of course I
> use ldb primarily in Samba4.

Have *you* personally tested an upgrade ?  Just asking.

> If you don't feel confident I can't obviously push it. 
> I think ldb code is mature and stable enough to get into
> samba3, but I see others have different views.

We'll revisit this as things progress in SAMBA_3_0.

> It seem to me we are back again to the specious 
> discussion that:

I'm not going to have this discussion again.  We'll see how
things progress in the 3.0 branch.



cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFbcEmIR7qMdg1EfYRAlp1AJkB7RtXdqrpYWtpwPIfANIixdmFPACfTMWt
tHIRjbRsdx/3R2jOAPvzMB4=
=mWmB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----