ldb for 3.0.24?
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Wed Nov 29 15:46:17 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> it mostly depends on when 3.0.24 will be released.
> The problems I see are:
> We use hardcoded attribute_name to attribute_handler mappings.
> The problem with it is that if we change them in the code,
> the records for indexes are created under different DN's
> if the attribute handler changes. We hit this problem in samba4
> last week, we're the attribute handler for the 'member' attribute
> was changed to use the ldb_canonicalise_dn() function instead of
> ldb_default_copy(), the result was that the index record
> for the member attribute changed from:
gahhh!!! I'm know I'm going to get flamed for this but *this*
kind of issue was exactly stability I voiced concerned over.
> And I think if we ship the current code with samba3,
> it will may hit a lot of people as the group_mapping.ldb
> uses indexed records.
> And in the current implementation the LOCAL-DBSPEED test
> says that tdb is 10 times faster than ldb.
ok. Based on that I'm going to pull ldb from 3.0.24. We can
leave it in SAMBA_3_0 for now, but if necessary, I'll pull
it from there and go back to using Volker's original multi-index
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical