jelmer at vernstok.nl
Mon Nov 27 20:58:35 GMT 2006
Sorry for the late reply.
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 12:44 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On irc you said that my fixes to pidl for output unique
> pointers are not the way to go, it should be fixed in the
> IDL. Is the attached patch to winreg.idl the way to go?
Yes, definitely. (Note that I haven't checked whether the patch works either, but the code looks good). Same thing for the code you just committed.
> I'm asking before putting effort into converting all the
> code, I did not even test it whether it gives a correct byte
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20061127/1cc3135b/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical