Admin logging SoC project requirements

simo idra at
Wed May 31 14:22:31 GMT 2006

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:21 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:53:21AM -0400, simo wrote:
> > It may be worth than to pass in the conn struct and make the user struct
> > and any other necessary info is linked by that, this way we can add
> > later other information without the need to change all the interfaces.
> The conn struct as it is implemented right now has the
> problem that it mixes both the vuid and tid information in
> one structure. conn has historically (VERY long ago) been
> what is the tree struct in Samba4. Mainly it comes from
> times where we only supported security=share. Samba4 gets
> this right by separating tid and vuid, and I want to slowly
> morph Samba3 in that direction. Thus I want to add a
> smbsrv_request structure that contains essentially the same
> information that the corresponding samba4 structure also
> has.

Sounds like this is the right approach.
The more the code becomes similar the more we will be able to share
code, I like this.

Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: idra at

More information about the samba-technical mailing list