libtdb.h and libtdb.c
dave.daugherty at centrify.com
Tue May 30 16:46:41 GMT 2006
Byteorder.h is GPL (not LGPL) and so far all of the headers I am using
are carefully LGPL, because libtdb.h gets including in our base code
I would prefer to use byteorder.h if it is converted to LGPL as I agree
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jra at samba.org]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:42 PM
To: Dave Daugherty
Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: libtdb.h and libtdb.c
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 08:50:56PM -0700, Dave Daugherty wrote:
> I have a series of items I am hoping to get into the upcoming 3.0.23
> If you don't think it is generic enough to warrant inclusion in main
> stream Samba that's okay.
Sorry it's taken me a while to get to this. The thing I
don't like about it is the get/put 1 byte functions. These
are overkill (IMHO) and are reinventing the wheel w.r.t.
IVAL,IVALS,SVAL etc. Look in include/byteorder.h for
Any chance you can re-work it to use the same methods
as the rest of Samba ?
More information about the samba-technical