Why use krb5_set_real_time() instead of NTP ?

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:

> Maybe I'm being dense here, but is this really the case of
> a user space application working around trying to work around
> an unsynchronized system clock on the client ?

Apparently this is.  I spoke with tridge on #samba-technical
and drug up the cvs logs.  This was his change to cope with
clock skew.  Looks like the krb5_set_real_time() calls are
important enough to keep.







cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?"      --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEYXW+IR7qMdg1EfYRAmyQAKDjF0/RphiU36PSGEBa7rkYf6VGiwCg5lt7
0eDTrb12Eg6G7yakduCN3U4=
=toCw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----