Why use krb5_set_real_time() instead of NTP ?
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Wed May 10 05:10:22 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Maybe I'm being dense here, but is this really the case of
> a user space application working around trying to work around
> an unsynchronized system clock on the client ?
Apparently this is. I spoke with tridge on #samba-technical
and drug up the cvs logs. This was his change to cope with
clock skew. Looks like the krb5_set_real_time() calls are
important enough to keep.
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical