request to remove security=share

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 17:18 -0600, Steven French wrote:
> > but it is so trivial to support
> Perhaps one case in which it is nicer to be working on the "client"
> side :)
> 
> The client is easy  ... as it is still is NTLM (would be fun to allow
> NTLMv2), just skip session setup and stick the encrypted challenge in
> the tconx

The problem is the username arguments in the hash calculation.
Otherwise, this would sort of almost work (due to the way this is
plumbed)

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060315/d9a9144a/attachment.bin