request to remove security=share
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Sun Mar 12 22:31:12 GMT 2006
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:21:17PM -0500, simo wrote:
> Why don't just add a read only password and a read write password ?
> We already have the username option, we just need to change it to be
> the name of the user we are going to access the share with in the
> security=share case.
As I said in my other mail: I don't think putting the
passwords into secrets.tdb is particularly good, we would
have to create yet another mechanism for editing passwords
etc. I'm also thinking about clustered scenarios. We already
have the pain that the interdomain trust account passwords
are not in passdb. Why should we put more information into
secrets.tdb when we have a flexible mechanism around?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060312/35b34d0d/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical