ldap filter gone and sambadomainnname not checked
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Sun Mar 12 15:54:44 GMT 2006
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:52:12AM +0100, Pierre Filippone wrote:
> And its probably also true, that most users will not need these options.
> But if you think of larger enterprises that heavily use opensource
> applications and that already have a large directory, for those this would
> be really, really useful options. How about developer options with a
> comment like "Every support request caused by false usage of these options
> will cost you a pizza scampi delivered to each team member".
This just does not work, we have had this in the past far
> Of course one alternative is to move samba to its own tree, database or
> own direcory server and write some synchronisation scripts. But until
> today, we are quite happy with the integration of all applications in a
> central directory.
You might also try to play with the OpenLDAP meta backend.
This seems to do just what you want to do, my manpage
slapd-meta(5) talks about the possibility to rewrite
searches on their way from the client to the server.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060312/73137b21/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical