Improving Samba 3 automated testing
ab at samba.org
Fri Mar 3 14:43:05 GMT 2006
Volker Lendecke пишет:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 07:17:51AM -0700, Jim McDonough wrote:
>> I was thinking that we could have some way of flagging individual tests as
>> to whether they would be for a samba3 run or not. The default would be to
>> say 'no', and one by one we can allow the tests for samba3 runs.
> It's more complicated than that... The Samba4 tests are not
> fine-grained enough. The often-cited RAW-OPLOCK test is a
> good example: Samba3 is expected to pass all of the subtests
> if it has 'kernel oplocks = no', with kernel oplocks under
> Linux enabled the LevelII oplock tests fail. Do we want to
> cover that kind of scenario?
Should we rewrite smbtorture tests in ejs? This would allow arbitrary
grouping (through include statements) and simpler integration.
What functionality isn't available at ejs layer that tests are using?
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Samba Team http://www.samba.org/
ALT Linux Team http://www.altlinux.org/
Midgard Project Ry http://www.midgard-project.org/
More information about the samba-technical