Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Wed Jun 21 14:16:15 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Chetan S wrote:
> I have a evil foreboding of registry finally making it
> into Samba. Thanks to Jerry's commandment at SambaXP ? :)
> A fixed consistent api for managing samba ( performance
> metrics, smb paramenter configuration ) is what my
> discussion was about.
Call it a config backend if the word registry invokes nightmares.
But the idea is sane. And a good match for the things you mention.
I'll win you all over in the end. :-)
> I would rather agree with Volker's suggestion of splitting
> swat. That way it should be possible to have rpc based
> lib without really dealing with what we suck at ( GUI ).
> I hope I am not missing any point here.
If we throw away swat and provide perl/python bindings
for libmsrpc.so then we can integrate scripts into 'make test'.
None of us use SWAT which is why it sucks. That's not going
to change (or use or its suckage) from what I can tell.
A test case is no good unless it is run.
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical