Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Wed Jun 21 13:24:04 GMT 2006
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:00:45PM +0400, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> I agree with you on this. I also had ideas to actually rewrite SWAT in
> samba3 by backporting ejs and webserver code (as standalone app) from
> samba4. This way the SWAT actual code will be in ejs and the same API
> can be maintained (and used) between both samba3 and samba4 for most of
> the interface code while actual low-level implementation will be different.
How well encapsulated is the ejs engine really? Can we just
dump it into Samba3 and have it available?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060621/dc79c26e/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical