[PATCH] Samba4 and LDAP servers
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Jun 15 14:05:10 GMT 2006
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 11:35 +0200, Martin Kühl wrote:
> > In terms of infrastructure, Martin proposed to avoid the need for a
> > partitions module, but I've provided that, so his work-around should no
> > longer be required.
> I still think it makes a more suitable "first module" than ldb_map.
> Maybe someone can take a look at that after my next commit and check
> whether I understood the basics?
I'll try and have a look today.
> > Indeed, the discussion should be here. Martin asked Tridge and I some
> > questions privately, but Martin, I think this is your cue...
> The main question I'm still unclear about is whether support for
> flexible mappings in ejs or completeness of mappings to/from samba 3
> should be prioritised.
I'm thinking Samba3 mappings. There is a lot of groundwork already, and
a clear 'success condition'. They should inform the ejs mappings (and
perhaps inform you that ejs just isn't up to the task, or at least what
limitations the process has).
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060615/a93ed542/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical