psexec for Linux and svcctl.idl changes

[AH]

Jelmer Vernooij:
> However, I'm not too keen on putting in the winexe patch (at least not
> in the current state.. I think linking a Windows binary into Samba is a
> very very bad idea. 
>
> Also, there are also other minor issues:
>
>  * Code style
>  * Use of // for comments
>  * Use of manually written prototypes in the C files
>  * Use of direct headers (<termios.h>, etc) instead of <system/xx.h>
>  * CamelCasing
>  * The Windows code should (imho) go in some different place
>  * Even /if/ we did think including a .exe in Samba was ok, 'winexe'
> should be made optional because we don't want to require people to
> install MSVC in order to build Samba.
>
>   
Thanks for comments.
I am still working on winexe, for now I publish code on 
http://eol.ovh.org/winexe/.
If people on this list are interested I can send info about progress, or 
even post patches.

Of course I agree about style and others ( I need to find out how to 
make prototypes auto generated).
Many things I will correct by myself, but for many I need advice, I hope 
to find it on this list.

About compiling windows code - I have never used MSVC to compile it, at 
the beginning I've used Cygwin,
but now I compile everything in Linux. Of course I have installed 
crosscompiler, below list of rpm packages (PLD distro):
crossmingw32-gcc-c++-3.4.3-4
crossmingw32-runtime-3.7-1
crossmingw32-gcc-3.4.3-4
crossmingw32-w32api-3.2-1
crossmingw32-binutils-2.15.94.0.2-1
So this is some dependency, but not such big as MSVC :)

And about integrating it with samba - it would be nice, we can work on it :)

Andrzej Hajda