does ldapsam:trusted=yes really work?

[Volker Lendecke]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> This means all really small, embedded systems running Samba.

Okay, that's a valid thing. For the _really_ small ones looking at Samba4 might
also be desirable. Samba4 is far from finished, but it has architectural
provisions to make embedded devices easier.

> Generally, what needs to be done to make this work (users in LDAP 
> without NSS)?
> Perhaps there could be an "ugly" hack (comment out checking for a user 
> via NSS etc.), or is it more complicated?

I'd assume it's a bit more complicated, as we need a unix id for permission
checking. I need to take a closer look, but this might take a while.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060130/66ba6df9/attachment.bin