SAMBA_3_0_RELEASE *not* ready for general consumption yet

[Alexander Bokovoy]

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> /jerry waves at everyone to svn up and test on their platform.
> 
> A majority of the diff is code reformatting from you and
> Jeremy.  (We'll talk about this later :-) ).  And Guenther
> has a significant amount of "sed 's/d_printf(/d_fprintf(stderr,/'"
> in the net code.
> 
> I'm testing against a Samba PDC (x86) and 3 domain members servers
> (one x64, one x86, and one Sparc).  I haven't run a gambit of
> Windows domain member servers yet.
The MS SMS 2003 installation fix wasn't ported fully, a part of opening 
BUILTIN domain was missed (attached). The difference with SAMBA_3_0 
branch is absence of builtin_domain_name() in the RELEASE branch, thus 
direct comparison.

-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Samba Team                      http://www.samba.org/
ALT Linux Team                  http://www.altlinux.org/
Midgard Project Ry              http://www.midgard-project.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: samba-3_0_RELEASE-ms-sms-2003.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 655 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060125/e970e546/samba-3_0_RELEASE-ms-sms-2003.bin