local SAM access vs. rpc [was Re: svn commit: samba r13017 - in
trunk/source: lib utils
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Thu Jan 19 16:59:16 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 03:10 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>> Beyond that the unix domain socket appeals to me. I'm not sure
>> that it a good thing yet. The more we eat our own dogfood (internal
>> APIs), the better we will be. But it's late, and I need to think
>> some more.
> Only marginally related to this, but this provides a good context for a
> point I noticed while playing with Samba4 LDB modules.
> Over the past few months, I've been trying to move as much 'logic' as
> possible from Samba4's initial template files (ldif user/group/etc
> entries for the first-time database) into ldb modules, to determine at
I think one of the things that Samba 4 has correct is interfaces.
Part of what I want to finally fix is to break out a libsamdb.so
which is used by smbd and net. The RPC and local access methods
are too intertwined.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical