svn commit: samba r13017 - in trunk/source: lib utils
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Thu Jan 19 06:05:43 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
vlendec at samba.org wrote:
> Author: vlendec
> Date: 2006-01-18 21:27:58 +0000 (Wed, 18 Jan 2006)
> New Revision: 13017
> WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=13017
> Implement "net sam rights". I know there's "net rpc rights", but I want to have
> a tool that works without a running smbd.
You're killing me here. I know you hate 'net groupmap' but what
you are doing is no different it seems. Why do we need to have two
code paths? Which one do we recommend to use? Honestly, I am glad
to see pdbedit cleaned up. I'm not sure I agree with your complaints
about 'net groupmap' but that's no big deal. I can live with this.
But 'net sam rights'? I'm not sure I agree with this one.
It seems a little gratuitous and overboard. My concern is
confusion for end users. Plus it feels a little like "not
invented here". Am I jumping to conclusions?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical