[Proposal] Samba 3.2.0 to replace 3.0.22

Lars Müller lmuelle at SuSE.de
Sat Jan 14 18:16:15 GMT 2006

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:57:39PM -0600, Gerald Carter wrote:
> James, from the viewpoint of a vendor and off the record,
> how bad would 3.0 and 3.2 make your life?

From the viewpoint of an operating system vendor we have to ensure to
provide an as smouth as possible update path for any Samba release.

And nowadays our customers and partners expect to get the latest stable
Samba release for our products.  Therefore it doesn't differ if we name
it 3.0 or 3.2.

As we plan to integrate several huger pieces I prefer the 3.2 approach.

But the main message is: We'll go along and therefore will care very
serious about the update path.

Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ]
Samba Team
SuSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060114/32a14822/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list