svn commit: samba r12695 -
in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs: .
jelmer at samba.org
Wed Jan 4 13:34:00 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
David Collier-Brown wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:42:28AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote about
>> 'Re: svn commit: samba r12695 - in
>> branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs: .':
>>> Does windows allow such a name in 'system -> computer name'?
>> Samba 3 allows it so it is necessary in some cases to have, in order
>> to have a clean upgrade path.
> Is this something that can be detected and optionally corrected
> in an upgrading script?
Yes, it could be detected and corrected. However, we could only fix this
on the server that is being upgraded - If it is a DC, its domain members
will break because we can't fix the NetBIOS name remotely. If it is a
domain member, it won't be able to access its domain later on.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical