svn commit: samba r12695 -
in branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs: .
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Wed Jan 4 10:07:15 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Andrew Bartlett schrieb:
> On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 17:22 +0000, jelmer at samba.org wrote:
>> Author: jelmer
>> Date: 2006-01-03 17:22:19 +0000 (Tue, 03 Jan 2006)
>> New Revision: 12695
>> WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=12695
>> A dot is allowed in NetBIOS names.
>> Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs/provision.js
>> --- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs/provision.js 2006-01-03 15:40:05 UTC (rev 12694)
>> +++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs/provision.js 2006-01-03 17:22:19 UTC (rev 12695)
>> @@ -481,11 +481,11 @@
>> // Check whether a name is valid as a NetBIOS name.
>> -// FIXME: There are probably more constraints here
>> +// FIXME: There are probably more constraints here.
>> +// crh has a paragraph on this in his book (18.104.22.168)
>> function valid_netbios_name(name)
>> if (strlen(name) > 13) return false;
>> - if (strstr(name, ".")) return false;
>> return true;
> I still don't think we should allow a dot here. It may be allowed by
> crh's rules, but I think we are just asking for pain in Samba4 if we
> allow it.
> Does windows allow such a name in 'system -> computer name'?
I use 'MX.BASE' as the netbios domain name currently on my old samba3
domain, and my windows clients work very well
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical