svn commit: samba r12695 - in
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Jan 3 22:42:28 GMT 2006
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 17:22 +0000, jelmer at samba.org wrote:
> Author: jelmer
> Date: 2006-01-03 17:22:19 +0000 (Tue, 03 Jan 2006)
> New Revision: 12695
> WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=12695
> A dot is allowed in NetBIOS names.
> Modified: branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs/provision.js
> --- branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs/provision.js 2006-01-03 15:40:05 UTC (rev 12694)
> +++ branches/SAMBA_4_0/source/scripting/libjs/provision.js 2006-01-03 17:22:19 UTC (rev 12695)
> @@ -481,11 +481,11 @@
> // Check whether a name is valid as a NetBIOS name.
> -// FIXME: There are probably more constraints here
> +// FIXME: There are probably more constraints here.
> +// crh has a paragraph on this in his book (126.96.36.199)
> function valid_netbios_name(name)
> if (strlen(name) > 13) return false;
> - if (strstr(name, ".")) return false;
> return true;
I still don't think we should allow a dot here. It may be allowed by
crh's rules, but I think we are just asking for pain in Samba4 if we
Does windows allow such a name in 'system -> computer name'?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060104/b094692c/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical