Remove smbwrapper?
David Collier-Brown
David.Collier-Brown at Sun.COM
Mon Jan 2 15:46:18 GMT 2006
Has anyone entered a bug for this failure? I don't see it
in bugtraq. As suggested earlier, it segfaults right
after stat64("/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf", 0xFFBFDBA0) Err#2 ENOENT
--dave
David Collier-Brown wrote:
> Just FYI, the samba-3.0 copy builds in Solaris 10 with the Sun compilers.
>
> --dave
>
> David Collier-Brown wrote:
>
>> It works fine on Solaris 8 through 10, but I haven't built it
>> lately because it defaults to off instead of auto in Configure.
>> That discourages me from noticing bugs, you see (;-))
>>
>> As it happens, it only uses a small subset of the functionality
>> of loadparm, and therefor doesn't need the dependency on
>> tdb that the samba server requires. Indeed, it seems odd to me
>> that it depend on smb.conf at all! It's not a server, after all.
>>
>> --dave
>>
>> Volker Lendecke wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Right now smbwrapper in trunk does not build, mainly because using
>>> loadparm.o
>>> has to pull in tdb and sharesec.o which itself references for example
>>> prs_mem_free and sec_io_desc.
>>>
>>> I've never used it in production, and last I heard was that it is broken
>>> anyway. So is it worth putting any energy into it? Alternatively I would
>>> consider removing it.
>>>
>>> Volker
>>
>>
>>
>
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
davecb at canada.sun.com | -- Mark Twain
(416) 263-5733 (x65733) |
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list