[ldb] Re: Moving basic libs to a new repo and release them as a separate package

[simo]

On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 13:19 +1100, tridge at samba.org wrote:
> Metze,
> 
>  > so not just .so and .h files would be needed. we should take much care
>  > with the library soname fields and how we handle changes and
>  > coresponding minor and relase number updates. So that application will
>  > not break with library updates...
> 
> yep, it's quite a lot of work. It's a very worthwhile thing to aim
> for, but we need someone to volunteer to handle the fiddly parts of
> library maintainence.
> 
> Simo, how do you feel about becoming a library guru for ldb?

Uhmm I'm no expert on this, but if the only thing blocking ldb spinoff
is this, I will take a look at making it working in an as simple as
possible manner.

> Cheers, Tridge
> 
> PS: waiting for the dreaded 'libtool' to be suggested ...

/me wonder why libtool is so hated, but I've never looked into it so ...

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: idra at samba.org
http://samba.org