A packet or streams layer for GENSEC/SASL?

[Jeremy Allison]

On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:30:20PM -0500, David Collier-Brown wrote:
> Correction!
> 
> David Collier-Brown wrote:
> >   The same applies to low-level filesystem I/O as well,
>              ^- Insert "logic" here please, as I'm
>                 talking about what should be true, not
>                 what Samba 3 does, below.
> >with Samba being free to use quite large buffers
> >and the lower levels optionally shrinking them.
> >
> >   This is almost the exact opposite of how Samba
> >works now: unless you specify a large write size,
> >Samba uses small sized buffers whose size
> >correspond to what is desirable on the network,
> >and we hope that read(1) will coalesce them.

Can you explain further what you mean by this,
pointing to specific parts of the code please ?

Jeremy.