ready to merge trunk over SAMBA_3_0 ?

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Wed Feb 1 21:53:11 GMT 2006


On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 13:37 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> simo wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 14:15 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Everyone,
> >>
> >> Now that 3.0.21b has shipped, I'm ready to merge trunk
> >> over top of SAMBA_3_0 to get more testing for the new code
> >> that's been checked in.  Are there any objections?  Are
> >> there any known issues in trunk at the moment?
> > 
> > What about the new release?
> > Have you decided between 3.0.22 and 3.2.0 ?
> 
> I feel pretty strongly at this point that to branch
> to 3.2 would be too confusing for us and our users.
> Plus I don't think that we have the resources to
> do manage it correctly.

One advantage would be that we could just copy trunk to SAMBA_3_2, and
avoid all this problem about overwriting the SAMBA_3_0 branch.

> And let's face, if the linux kernel folks can get by
> without 2.7, we can manage the changes needed without
> a 3.2.

I'm not convinced the situations are comparable, but anyway...

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20060202/177e618d/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list