svn commit: samba r20394 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source: include lib smbd

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Sun Dec 31 09:35:28 GMT 2006


On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:53:11PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > I'm not sure I see the need for any messaging if you have a kernel- 
> > supported notification mechanism. I don't have a lot of context here,  
> > but I don't really see why you can't keep the same recv -> notify  
> > path without using messaging.
> 
> So long as you can keep the same code paths that's fine. I
> just assumed it'd be easier to funnel everything though the
> event mechanism (reduce possible differences/race conditions
> if everything becomes identically async).

And, I want correct semantics for all Samba-generated
changes even without any kernel mechanism. The kernel
mechanism can then generate additional events that are also
merged.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20061231/e76ab486/attachment.bin


More information about the samba-technical mailing list