LDB_SCOPE_ONELEVEL without full traversal?

[Volker Lendecke]

On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:35:38AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> So you want to handle this in your registry code, by adding
> a 'parentDN' to the subobjects and then doing a search like this:
> 
> basedn="" (parentDN=CN=container) scope=sub
> 
> instead of
> 
> basedn="CN=Container" (objectClass=*) scope=one
> 
> if so then I think it's fine:-)

Sure, I can certainly do that. But to me this feels just
wrong, this is something that ldb should do for me. Or do I
want too much from ldb?

Right now I'm looking at ltdb_index.c so see whether it
would be possible to do that automatically.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20061206/7ec3cf56/attachment.bin