LDB_SCOPE_ONELEVEL without full traversal?

[Volker Lendecke]

On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:18:25AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> But the problem is that it would take a view weeks or months to
> implement, because we need to make sure that it will be fast as the
> current ldb_tdb for the indexed searches.

As an intermediate solution for my direct problem, I think
Simo's idea of a parentDN is quite smart. I can certainly
code that above ldb, but this would subvert the idea of ldb
a bit. Coding it inside ldb might become an upgrade issue.

What do you think?

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20061206/78094da5/attachment.bin