. and .. in FindFirst or FindNext responses

[David Collier-Brown]

   If my leaky memory serves, that was done in a Unix work-alike
once, causing a number of programs to fail mysteriously...

--dave

Steven French wrote:
> Anyone know a way to force a server to return . and .. later than expected
> - such as instead of them being the first two entries in the FindFirst t2
> response - rather returned late in FindNext (or somewhere else later in
> FindFirst responses not in the first two positions of FindFirst)
> 
> 
> Steve French
> Senior Software Engineer
> Linux Technology Center - IBM Austin
> phone: 512-838-2294
> email: sfrench at-sign us dot ibm dot com

-- 
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb at spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain
(416) 223-5943