What is left for 3.0.20a ?

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Wed Sep 28 21:19:32 GMT 2005

On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 16:15 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Guenther Deschner wrote:
> | The wrong user and primary group sid in the NT
> | Token resulting from reply_spnego_kerberos (solved
> | in trunk by using the PAC) is really something
> | drastic, IMHO.
> |
> | As we need to solve the case where a user does not get a
> | PAC from a KDC (by intention) anyway, we could add
> | these calls maybe now for 3.0.20a.
> I'm a little nervous about the PAC work.  I'd rather just
> post it as a diff on the patches page until it gets some
> more mileage.

For what it's worth I agree here.  It may be a drastic change of
behaviour for the better, but it is still a drastic change of behaviour.

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.        http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050929/bc46912a/attachment.bin

More information about the samba-technical mailing list