pdb_mysql, pdb_pgsql and pdb_xml modules: request for maintainer

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
| Hi,
|
| The following people have showed interest in maintaining some of the
| experimental pdb modules:
|
| - Peter Rindfuss: pdb_mysql <rindfuss at wz-berlin.de>
| - Darrell McGuire: pdb_mysql <dmcguire at pegasys.cc>
| - Ulrich Meis: pdb_pgsql <kenobi at halifax.rwth-aachen.de>
| - Filip Jirsák: pdb_pgsql <filip at jirsak.org>
|
| Nobody has stepped up so far for the pdb_xml backend.
|
| Jerry, what do you think is easiest way to get changes in? Just let
| the new maintainers
| send patches to you? Or move these modules out of the tree and
| maintained seperately (like vfs_vscan, etc)?

I'd rather keep them in the tree if everyone agrees.
As jeremy said, sending patches to samba-technical
and CC'ing {jra,jerry}@samba.org is probably the best way to
move forward.

I think it would also be better for our sake to deal with
a single person that signs off on the patch to be committed.
But have everyone involved in reviewing it, fixing bugs,
etc....  What I'm trying to figure out is how we know when
a patch is ready to commit.  The recent discussion about
the current pdb_sql patch seems to be continuing so I need
someone to say "alright, here it is".






cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDOvcoIR7qMdg1EfYRArPGAKDNes4+YIaUlHqdpnmVUaq9lcpylwCg5Sg5
glAezpVfrv0tTP2vTmCSE2k=
=LAOL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----