svn commit: samba r10189 - in trunk/source/smbd: .
tpot at samba.org
Mon Sep 12 23:30:45 GMT 2005
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 09:13 +1000, James Peach wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 08:52 +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 15:06 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > > > Hi Jeremy. Isn't %p a better format code for displaying a pointer than
> > > > %lx?
> > >
> > > But is it standard and available everywhere ?
> > Hmm - it's at least C99 but I expect there is probably some weird
> > os/compiler combination that doesn't have it. )-:
> Won't %lx won't play poorly with a LLP64 data model?
Yep. I'm not sure we have any of those though. My ia64 boxes LP64 -
how about the SGI ones? I'm not sure what amd64 looks like.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20050913/4ca2a102/attachment.bin
More information about the samba-technical