Does NET RPC RIGHTS requires Linux PDC? additionally Samba 3.0.11 and RHEL 4 test

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Guenther Deschner wrote:

|> Guenther,  There should be no difference in smbd's code
|> that builds the user token for domain or ads mode security.
|> Do you known of a bug here that hasn't been reported?
|
|
| Yes, there is a big difference (I tried to explain to you during CIFS
| conf ;) :

Ahh....ok.  I remember now.

| You are right, I should open a bug report to track my progress
| on that.

That would help.  Do you have this on your plate to fix for 3.0.21?
Or is there anything I can do to help? I know you have already
pulled back PAC parsing code from SAMBA_4_0.




cheers, jerry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDHPUZIR7qMdg1EfYRAmjvAJ9DZCvTa8cV198oKj5QLaDo82j18QCfVJKh
ELJ+TTNnZysJlIuCqhhvqEc=
=MOML
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----